Comments on: Announcing the Jungle Disk Server Edition

By: Memory Foam Mattress Pads

Memory Foam Mattress Pads — Sun, 20 Feb 2011 04:26:29 +0000

I’m not sure why but this site is loading incredibly slow for me. Is anyone else having this issue or is it a problem on my end? I’ll check back later and see if the problem still exists.

By: Cierra Mello

Cierra Mello — Sun, 20 Feb 2011 00:40:11 +0000

Have you ever considered writing an ebook or guest authoring on other sites? I have a blog centered on the same information you discuss and would really like to have you share some stories/information. I know my viewers would appreciate your work. If you’re even remotely interested, feel free to shoot me an e-mail.

By: Evert

Evert — Thu, 29 Jul 2010 15:54:58 +0000

What is the status on MS SQL support?

By: Jungle Disk Launches an All New Product Lineup « Jungle Disk Blog

Jungle Disk Launches an All New Product Lineup « Jungle Disk Blog — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:17:31 +0000

[...] Jungle Disk Server Edition Announcement [...]

By: Jungle Dave

Jungle Dave — Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:54:30 +0000

Simon – the beta is available now. We do have a reseller program which will include the Server Edition in the future.

By: Simon Hebditch

Simon Hebditch — Thu, 22 Oct 2009 10:24:26 +0000

This sounds amazing, when is it going to be available?? I have so many clients who I would love to sell this to….. Do you have any kind of referral/partner program?

By: Stephen

Stephen — Tue, 20 Oct 2009 19:46:43 +0000

I’ll vote for a Mac OS Server version as well.

By: Kyle Alons

Kyle Alons — Tue, 20 Oct 2009 19:41:17 +0000

I see. Then it probably won’t be as dramatic for me — I’m backing up lots of pictures, home videos, and virtual machine images.

On a related note, are Rackspace or Amazon ever going to reduce their prices? Storage keeps getting cheaper and cheaper, but they’re rates haven’t unchanged in quite some time.

By: Jungle Dave

Jungle Dave — Tue, 20 Oct 2009 18:18:54 +0000

@Kyle – it really depends on what you’re backing up. If you have 200GB of pictures (with no duplication) then you won’t be saving much. If you’re backing up databases, mail servers, or file servers then the de-duplication and compression should have a significant benefit.

By: Kyle Alons

Kyle Alons — Tue, 20 Oct 2009 18:08:21 +0000

You indicated a 90% space savings with de-duplication and compression. Is that a realistic expectation in general, or what is the typical amount of savings others are experiencing? I have nearly 200 GB of stuff to backup and found JD+Amazon too expensive to justify in the past, so I’ve been using Mozy. It’s hard to justify spending more than $5/mo compared to that, and a 90% savings would be close ($2/mo for JD+ and $3/mo for Rackspace storage of 20GB). Thanks.